Standoff.
Tim Cook steps down.
“I can’t do my job without News Items.” — Jim Cramer, CNBC.
1. President Trump signaled he is unlikely to extend a two-week ceasefire with Iran that’s set to expire in two days, while Iran has yet to confirm it will participate in talks to end a war that’s engulfed the Middle East and upended global trade. Trump said in an interview yesterday that the ceasefire expires on Wednesday evening in Washington and he is “not going to be rushed into making a bad deal.” He said the Strait of Hormuz would stay blockaded for now, and “I’m not opening it until a deal is signed.” Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said his country would not “accept negotiations under the shadow of threats.” The standoff underscores the uncertainty surrounding a new round of talks, even after Trump said negotiations could begin as early as Tuesday. The US president has threatened strikes on Iran’s power infrastructure if diplomacy fails. A pause in hostilities has mostly held for two weeks after a conflict that killed thousands across the region and disrupted global energy supplies. (Sources: bloomberg.com, theguardian.com)
2. Robert Pape:
Iran has combined modest technologies with advantageous geography to create a lever over a critical artery of the global economy (the Strait of Hormuz).
Iran is unlikely to relinquish this source of power. No state voluntarily abandons a position that yields systemic influence.
The United States is unlikely to accept it. Iran’s gain translates directly into diminished U.S. freedom of action in a region long central to its strategy.
That leaves two broad paths.
The first is accommodation: accepting Iran’s emergence as a fourth center of world power. Under this path, Iran would consolidate its position atop a chokepoint that carries roughly one-quarter of global seaborne oil and nearly one-fifth of global LNG trade, converting geographic leverage into sustained economic and political power.
The second is escalation: attempting to wrest control of the Strait through sustained military operations. Given that only 3.5 to 5.5 million barrels per day can be rerouted through alternative pipelines—far short of total flows—any serious attempt to neutralize Iran’s leverage would require not just maritime operations, but physical control over the territory from which that leverage is exercised.
That is not a limited intervention. It is the opening phase of a much larger war.
 | A guest post by
|
 | A guest post by
|